Tech companies have been quick to jump on the AI bandwagon for hiring. It’s efficient, saves time, and makes sorting through endless résumés easier. But now, they’re dealing with something they didn’t see coming—candidates using AI to game the system.
Here’s the deal: job seekers are using generative AI to create résumés perfectly tailored to each job. They can churn out dozens of applications in a fraction of the time, and sometimes they’re not even doing it themselves—bots are doing the work for them. It doesn’t stop there. Candidates are also leaning on AI to prepare for interviews, which is making everyone sound like carbon copies of each other. There’s a uniformity in the way they respond, and recruiters are picking up on it.
So, what’s happening? Companies are being forced to bring back more human elements into their hiring process. They’re adding extra steps to weed out candidates who may not be as qualified as their AI-enhanced résumés suggest.
Of course, job seekers exaggerating their experience isn’t exactly new. People have always fluffed up their résumés to get noticed. But now, recruiters are noticing a spike in what they call “fake candidates.” These are people who apply for remote jobs, boasting qualifications that don’t hold up under scrutiny. In some cases, recruiters are even starting to suspect that candidates are using software or other people to help them get through Zoom interviews. It’s a whole new level of trickery.
For years, companies have relied on software to handle large parts of the hiring process—automating everything from screening to scheduling. It’s been efficient, but it’s also been frustrating for applicants, who often feel like their résumés are getting rejected by a machine before they even reach a human. Now, with a cooler job market and remote interviews becoming the norm, these AI-related problems are only getting worse.
Drowning in Applications
With AI speeding things up for candidates, some companies are finding themselves overwhelmed by résumés. In the past, applicants would take days to tailor a résumé for a role. Now? It can be done in minutes. Some companies have had to change the way they post jobs just to keep up.
It’s gotten to the point where job listings are sometimes only open for 24 to 48 hours. That’s how quickly résumés are pouring in. And it’s not just the number of applications that’s the issue—it’s the quality. Companies are starting to implement extra screening steps, like asking applicants specific questions before they can even submit their résumés. The goal? Make sure the people applying are actually interested in the job, not just spamming applications left and right.
Sure, companies want to use AI to help them manage the flood of résumés. But they don’t want to lose the human touch, either. The challenge is figuring out how to balance both.
Tightening the Screws on Screening
To combat the rise in AI-boosted applications, some companies are turning to—surprise—more tech. For example, interview software that records candidates’ interviews is being used to spot any strange behavior. Some recruiters have noticed candidates looking away from the camera during interviews, possibly getting AI-assisted prompts before answering. That’s a pretty big red flag and usually triggers more investigation.
Other companies are requiring applicants to record themselves answering a few questions before they even get to submit their application. The idea is to filter out the people who aren’t serious about the job.
For tech roles, where specific skills matter, candidates are often asked to take tests to show off what they can actually do. And while tools like ChatGPT aren’t banned for these tests, companies are getting smarter. It’s not enough to just pass the test—they’re asking candidates to explain their thought process during live interviews. It’s one thing to use AI to help, but you better know how and why you used it.
The Rise of “Fake” Candidates
It doesn’t stop with AI-assisted résumés. Some recruiters are running into full-blown fake candidates. Imagine this: someone applies for a remote job, aces the interview, but when they actually start the role, they clearly don’t have the skills they claimed. Or worse, the person who shows up on a Zoom call later doesn’t even look like the person who was originally interviewed.
Recruiters are noticing things that just don’t add up. Blurry backgrounds in video calls, candidates who sound like they’re in a call center, or résumés that don’t hold up under closer inspection. Some are even cross-checking university alumni lists to see if a candidate really graduated from where they claim. Little things like this can raise big red flags.
It’s not just small companies dealing with this problem either. Even well-known companies have accidentally hired fake candidates for remote roles, only to discover a few weeks later that the person can’t actually do the job they were hired for.
Résumé Padding and the ChatGPT Factor
On top of fake candidates, some job seekers are padding their résumés with AI-related experience they just don’t have. It’s not uncommon to see someone claim they have generative AI expertise that, when you look closely, doesn’t make sense based on their timeline.
For coding roles, some companies don’t mind if candidates use ChatGPT to help with tests. But here’s the catch: candidates have to be upfront about it. They’re expected to disclose what tools they used and explain why. During live interviews, they’re required to walk through their code and show they didn’t just copy and paste from ChatGPT.
It’s a way to ensure that candidates aren’t just relying on AI to get them through the door—they actually have the skills to back it up.
The Changing Face of Hiring
The way we hire is evolving, and AI is at the heart of it. But with these changes come new challenges. Tech companies are getting flooded with applications from candidates who are using AI to gain an edge. While automation makes the hiring process smoother, it can also make it harder to find the best talent in a sea of AI-generated applications.
In response, companies are adjusting their processes, adding more steps to make sure they’re hiring people with real skills. It’s becoming a delicate dance between leveraging the power of AI and maintaining the human judgment needed to hire the right people.
The hiring landscape is shifting, and it’s clear that AI isn’t going anywhere. But neither is the need for human insight.
Want to stay ahead of the AI hiring curve? Follow FractionPro to learn how to navigate AI’s role in recruitment and improve your hiring strategy.
Comments